The Controversy About Comedy Evaluator Pro Rages On

I was on a forum recently that had taken on the topic of my Comedy Evaluator Pro software. The overall consensus was that stand-up comedy is an “art” and laughter is not an important or even a noteworthy gauge for identifying a comedian’s skill on stage.

Oddly enough, these same folks tend to get severely pissed when I say that hiding behind the “art” of stand-up comedy is absolutely no excuse for sucking on stage as a comedian.

Note: I didn’t set the standards for stand-up comedy excellence.

In keeping with my stance that a COMEDIAN’S job is to generate laughs at the highest level, regardless of the subjective “art” part involved…

Let’s look at stand-up comedy from different perspectives.



Let’s assume that you are in a packed comedy club. After the opening act breaks the ice and has warmed up the audience they say:

“OK, now you get to select one of two comedians to come to the stage next. One comedian generates 5 seconds of laughter each minute on stage. The other comedian generates 20 seconds of laughter on stage. The choice is yours.”

Which comedian would you choose?

Now, let’s flip the script a bit.

Which comedian would YOU rather be:

A comedian who generates 20 seconds of laughter per minute on stage or a comedian who generates 5 seconds of laughter per minute on stage?

Let’s flip the script once again…

As a talent agent or booker, which comedian are you going to want to hire:

A comedian who generates 20 seconds of laughter per minute on stage or a comedian who generates 5 seconds of laughter per minute on stage?

For any comedian who chooses to hide behind “art” as justification of delivering stand-up comedy that generates mostly telepathic laughter…

Go for it. You will not be alone for sure—there are tons of so-called “comedians” that are more than willing to proclaim that the “art” of stand-up comedy cannot simply be measured by my software, nor does generating laughter really matter in the “bigger” picture.



And that’s exactly where I will put the kibosh on that nonsense every single time—without hesitation or reservation.

Laughter generation is the ultimate result of successful execution of the “art” of stand-up, as well as a DIRECT reflection of an individual’s true skill as an “artist” — which encompasses their style, wit, sense of humor, perspective, etc. That’s why they are called COMEDIANS…

Is it a bad thing that this can be objectively measured? Just ask any comedian who CAN’T deliver 18+ seconds of laughter for each performing minute or doesn’t employ any sort or performance improvement activities…

Yes, they will tell you it’s a bad thing or doesn’t really matter. And I will tell you that…

Back in the day, they used to sniff goat urine as a means to combat bubonic plague. That mentality didn’t work either.


Do your friends think you're funny? Have you thought seriously about becoming a pro comedian? If that describes you, you might want to take a very close look at what this website has to offer that can dramatically improve your chances of success.

5 Replies to “The Controversy About Comedy Evaluator Pro Rages On”

  1. Wow, was I surprised last night! Yesterday I spent the whole evening watching open mic night videos on YouTube. Because there are no comedy clubs or open mic nights where I live, I wanted to see what see what the caliber of the comedy would be. I was shocked, then saddened, to watch the amateur “comedians” perform — shocked to learn how UN-funny the performances were; saddened because I felt embarrassed for the performers.

    Is it typical to have an audience sit through act after act without hearing laughter, or even a chuckle? In the first paragraph of this article, Steve writes (of a different experience), “It overall consensus was that stand-up comedy is an “art” and laughter is not an important or even a noteworthy gauge for identifying a comedian’s skill on stage.” This statement would almost exactly reflect what I experienced in my YouTube video viewing last evening — except that there was little or no “art” to be found!

    What I observed was groups of people (different clubs) taking turns going to the microphone and merely spilling random thoughts, with unclear, under-developed ideas, and almost no humour. I agree with Steve: “Laughter generation is the ‘ultimate result’ of successful execution of the “art” of stand-up, as well as a DIRECT reflection of an individual’s skill as an “artist”….”

  2. I can definitely see why some view Eval Pro as controversial. By using the Eval Pro it puts pressure on comedians. Now they have a non-subjective scale of their performance, now you can tell which comedian is better. No longer can people just go by the feeling.

    This disturbs people. It takes confidence to go up against yourself every single time you perform.

  3. How can your evaluator be controvesial? It is basically a stopwatch. No offense intended, but you admit as much yourself. Which is why i can’t see any controvercy.

    It measures laughter. That’s it, that’s all. The software evaluates the audience more than the performer. It’s a tool to help comedians reach a goal.

    If my car breaks down, I could have all the best tools and parts in the world, but without the knowledge and talent to use the tools, they are useless to me, and the car will sit unfixed.

    That pretty much sums up your software and courses. They are excellent tools, but only for the people who are willing to grow and learn to use them. (gotta have some talent too!)